<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Victoria&#039;s Advice Column</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Expositing by Victoria Mixon</title>
		<link>http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/2010/06/04/expositing/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Mixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/?p=292#comment-794</guid>
		<description>Yes, you&#039;re right.

Bad or weak pieces of work should simply not be made. A well-designed movie shows what&#039;s going on with the action, setting, and dialog---there&#039;s no actual need for exposition in film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you&#8217;re right.</p>
<p>Bad or weak pieces of work should simply not be made. A well-designed movie shows what&#8217;s going on with the action, setting, and dialog&#8212;there&#8217;s no actual need for exposition in film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Starting a chapter with dialog by Anne Duguid</title>
		<link>http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/2010/06/18/starting-a-chapter-with-dialog/comment-page-1/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Duguid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/?p=358#comment-526</guid>
		<description>Brilliant advice, Victoria. Just what I was looking for to counteract  the you-must-not brigades. Bookmarked and shared</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant advice, Victoria. Just what I was looking for to counteract  the you-must-not brigades. Bookmarked and shared</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keeping your novel on track over the long haul: for young writers by Victoria Mixon</title>
		<link>http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/2011/02/24/keeping-your-novel-on-track-over-the-long-haul-for-young-writers/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Mixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/?p=469#comment-510</guid>
		<description>I bet you are, Cathy! Books are &lt;i&gt;enormous&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet you are, Cathy! Books are <i>enormous</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bringing quality literature to the masses by Victoria Mixon</title>
		<link>http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/2011/04/19/bringing-quality-literature-to-the-masses/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Mixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/?p=535#comment-469</guid>
		<description>Yeah, they rely pretty heavily on their role as the gatekeepers---which dates back to an era in which editors edited books before publishing them, so there &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt;, in many (not all!) cases, a guarantee of quality.

But now that that&#039;s been dropped by the wayside in favor of higher numbers (it takes less quality-control effort to shove 100 books through the chute in one month than to edit 10 books through the chute in the same amount of time), the quality of their books show it.

Like any other historical milestone, it always comes back to the same formula: increasing expertise among random practitioners eventually builds a citadel of professionals, until that citadel begins to feel smug and focus more on their own egos than on the expertise that made them. Then the amateurs storm the gates and take back the power. And the cycle starts all over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, they rely pretty heavily on their role as the gatekeepers&#8212;which dates back to an era in which editors edited books before publishing them, so there <i>was</i>, in many (not all!) cases, a guarantee of quality.</p>
<p>But now that that&#8217;s been dropped by the wayside in favor of higher numbers (it takes less quality-control effort to shove 100 books through the chute in one month than to edit 10 books through the chute in the same amount of time), the quality of their books show it.</p>
<p>Like any other historical milestone, it always comes back to the same formula: increasing expertise among random practitioners eventually builds a citadel of professionals, until that citadel begins to feel smug and focus more on their own egos than on the expertise that made them. Then the amateurs storm the gates and take back the power. And the cycle starts all over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bringing quality literature to the masses by Steve Poling</title>
		<link>http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/2011/04/19/bringing-quality-literature-to-the-masses/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Poling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/?p=535#comment-468</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s my opinion that much of the &quot;quality&quot; debate is FUD (fear, uncertainty &amp; doubt) spread by the traditional publishers to keep the market away from indie publishers and self-published authors.

The reason why the FUD works is that it&#039;s too-often true. I&#039;ve thought that the reading public could crowd-source the winnowing of wheat from chaff. And I&#039;ve expressed my opinions in longer form &lt;a href=&quot;http://diogenesclubarchives.blogspot.com/2011/09/publishing-ebooks-and-saving-money.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s my opinion that much of the &#8220;quality&#8221; debate is FUD (fear, uncertainty &amp; doubt) spread by the traditional publishers to keep the market away from indie publishers and self-published authors.</p>
<p>The reason why the FUD works is that it&#8217;s too-often true. I&#8217;ve thought that the reading public could crowd-source the winnowing of wheat from chaff. And I&#8217;ve expressed my opinions in longer form <a href="http://diogenesclubarchives.blogspot.com/2011/09/publishing-ebooks-and-saving-money.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bringing quality literature to the masses by Victoria Mixon</title>
		<link>http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/2011/04/19/bringing-quality-literature-to-the-masses/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Mixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/?p=535#comment-467</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely right, Sarah---readers need someone they can trust to screen the flood for them.  There&#039;s just too much out there, and more is being published all the time.

Traditionally, we&#039;ve relied on publishers for that screening, and publishers and readers both have relied on a tiny handful of prominent reviewers to screen available books into a small recommended minority: the &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt;, the &lt;i&gt;LA Times&lt;/i&gt;, the &lt;i&gt;Chicago Sun&lt;/i&gt;, the &lt;i&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/i&gt;, and a few others. 

Meanwhile, those readers who liked to read a whole lot of similar books quickly learned to rely on publishers&#039; genre categories. This is how Penguin revolutionized the reading masses through their dimestore paperbacks in the 1930s. 

And now a similar tectonic shift is happening in publishing, with e-books and self-publishing. 

We&#039;re already seeing a rise in dependence upon book review blogs that cater to specific readerships. These reviewers are beginning to hold the power, screening the flood of books---traditionally published, e-books, and self-published---for their readers.

On the other end of the scale, independent editors are being brought into the picture to maintain and even raise the quality through this system, as it breaks free of traditional publishers and evolves into a radical new beast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right, Sarah&#8212;readers need someone they can trust to screen the flood for them.  There&#8217;s just too much out there, and more is being published all the time.</p>
<p>Traditionally, we&#8217;ve relied on publishers for that screening, and publishers and readers both have relied on a tiny handful of prominent reviewers to screen available books into a small recommended minority: the <i>New York Times</i>, the <i>LA Times</i>, the <i>Chicago Sun</i>, the <i>San Francisco Chronicle</i>, and a few others. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, those readers who liked to read a whole lot of similar books quickly learned to rely on publishers&#8217; genre categories. This is how Penguin revolutionized the reading masses through their dimestore paperbacks in the 1930s. </p>
<p>And now a similar tectonic shift is happening in publishing, with e-books and self-publishing. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re already seeing a rise in dependence upon book review blogs that cater to specific readerships. These reviewers are beginning to hold the power, screening the flood of books&#8212;traditionally published, e-books, and self-published&#8212;for their readers.</p>
<p>On the other end of the scale, independent editors are being brought into the picture to maintain and even raise the quality through this system, as it breaks free of traditional publishers and evolves into a radical new beast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bringing quality literature to the masses by Sarah McCanless</title>
		<link>http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/2011/04/19/bringing-quality-literature-to-the-masses/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah McCanless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/?p=535#comment-466</guid>
		<description>This is interesting. When I think about the &quot;quality&quot; debate, I am not worrying about whether great &quot;literature&quot; will survive the floodgates opening. I am more worried about the qualities you describe - well-structured, well-told, page-turning stories.

I have yet to download a self-published book to my Kindle that I wanted to keep reading past the first few pages. I *know* the quality is out there somewhere, but I don&#039;t necessarily want to spend the time to find it. So publishers still serve a vital gate-keeping function for me. Not every published book grips my imagination, but the odds of finding a gem are much greater when I&#039;m searching in a pre-screened pool.

I&#039;m not down on self-publishing. As I said, the quality is out there. Maybe, in the new world of self-publishing, trusted book reviewers will take on the role of helping the rest of us find it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting. When I think about the &#8220;quality&#8221; debate, I am not worrying about whether great &#8220;literature&#8221; will survive the floodgates opening. I am more worried about the qualities you describe &#8211; well-structured, well-told, page-turning stories.</p>
<p>I have yet to download a self-published book to my Kindle that I wanted to keep reading past the first few pages. I *know* the quality is out there somewhere, but I don&#8217;t necessarily want to spend the time to find it. So publishers still serve a vital gate-keeping function for me. Not every published book grips my imagination, but the odds of finding a gem are much greater when I&#8217;m searching in a pre-screened pool.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not down on self-publishing. As I said, the quality is out there. Maybe, in the new world of self-publishing, trusted book reviewers will take on the role of helping the rest of us find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making choices between fight or flight by Victoria Mixon</title>
		<link>http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/2011/10/06/making-choices-between-fight-or-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Mixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 02:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/?p=620#comment-450</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re very welcome, Nastia! &quot;Painfully awesome&quot; is perhaps the best description of this craft I have ever heard in my life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re very welcome, Nastia! &#8220;Painfully awesome&#8221; is perhaps the best description of this craft I have ever heard in my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making choices between fight or flight by Nastia</title>
		<link>http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/2011/10/06/making-choices-between-fight-or-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Nastia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 02:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/?p=620#comment-449</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the insights! After reading this I saw exactly where my MC would change her mind in my story. I gotta say - it&#039;s priceless. I feel like I did a full day of work on top of my regular job.... who thought writing is so painfully awesome?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the insights! After reading this I saw exactly where my MC would change her mind in my story. I gotta say &#8211; it&#8217;s priceless. I feel like I did a full day of work on top of my regular job&#8230;. who thought writing is so painfully awesome?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Judging when to use or not to use exposition by Victoria Mixon</title>
		<link>http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/2011/03/21/justing-when-to-use-or-not-to-use-exposition/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Mixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.victoriamixon.com/advice/?p=500#comment-438</guid>
		<description>Oh, fabulous, Laureli! How fun!

You can use your gut to guide you about scenes---if you&#039;re dreading it, there&#039;s a reason. This is what Roz Morris calls yours &quot;spider sense.&quot; It looks like you were dreading this scene because it wasn&#039;t going to be exciting, and you, just like your reader, only want exciting scenes. Now you know you can rely on your spider sense about future scenes, too.

Remember not to write toward your character&#039;s Resolution. Only toward her Climax. You won&#039;t know how her story is resolved until you&#039;ve written the whole thing and learned everything you need to learn about who she is and what she&#039;s going to choose when she&#039;s finally backed against the wall. Your job until then is to back her against the wall with a &lt;i&gt;vengeance&lt;/i&gt;. In this way you illuminate for your reader what we humans are really made of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, fabulous, Laureli! How fun!</p>
<p>You can use your gut to guide you about scenes&#8212;if you&#8217;re dreading it, there&#8217;s a reason. This is what Roz Morris calls yours &#8220;spider sense.&#8221; It looks like you were dreading this scene because it wasn&#8217;t going to be exciting, and you, just like your reader, only want exciting scenes. Now you know you can rely on your spider sense about future scenes, too.</p>
<p>Remember not to write toward your character&#8217;s Resolution. Only toward her Climax. You won&#8217;t know how her story is resolved until you&#8217;ve written the whole thing and learned everything you need to learn about who she is and what she&#8217;s going to choose when she&#8217;s finally backed against the wall. Your job until then is to back her against the wall with a <i>vengeance</i>. In this way you illuminate for your reader what we humans are really made of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

